Cultivating Diversity: Field Scattering as Agricultural
Risk Management in Cuyo Cuyo, Department of Puno, Peru
Table 9.8
Reduction in variance for potato fields of Puna Ayllu study families
(page 332)
| n = 2 cv |
54.8% |
63.3% |
57.7% |
62.4% |
62.4% |
62.3% |
59.8% |
57.7% |
65.1% |
60.6% |
9 |
| n = 3 cv |
33.4% |
47.4% |
38.5% |
46.1% |
46.1% |
46.1% |
41.9% |
38.5% |
50.1% |
43.1% |
9 |
| n = 4 cv |
|
37.4% |
25.0% |
35.6% |
35.6% |
35.6% |
29.9% |
25.0% |
40.9% |
33.1% |
8 |
| n = 5 cv |
|
29.9% |
|
27.6% |
27.6% |
27.6% |
20.0% |
|
34.2% |
27.8% |
6 |
| n = 6 cv |
|
23.7% |
|
20.8% |
20.8% |
20.8% |
|
|
28.9% |
23.0% |
5 |
| n = 7 cv |
|
18.1% |
|
14.3% |
14.3% |
14.3% |
|
|
24.4% |
17.1% |
5 |
| n = 8 cv |
|
12.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4% |
16.5% |
2 |
| n = 9 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.7% |
16.7% |
1 |
| n = 10 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0% |
13.0% |
1 |
| n = 11 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1% |
9.1% |
1 |
| n = 12 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Numbers in this row are the actual coefficient of variation calculated.
Values in subsequent rows are the percentage reduction relative to this
number. |