Cultivating Diversity: Field Scattering as Agricultural
Risk Management in Cuyo Cuyo, Department of Puno, Peru
Table 9.7
Reduction in variance for potato fields of Ura Ayllu study families
(page 331)
| n = 2 cv |
57.7% |
61.2% |
61.2% |
61.2% |
61.2% |
59.8% |
64.0% |
65.8% |
54.8% |
61.2% |
60.8% |
10 |
| n = 3 cv |
38.5% |
44.3% |
44.3% |
44.3% |
44.3% |
41.9% |
48.5% |
51.2% |
33.3% |
44.3% |
43.4% |
10 |
| n = 4 cv |
25.0% |
33.2% |
33.2% |
33.2% |
33.2% |
29.9% |
38.8% |
42.3% |
|
33.2% |
33.6% |
9 |
| n = 5 cv |
|
24.5% |
24.5% |
24.5% |
24.5% |
20.0% |
31.7% |
35.9% |
|
24.5% |
26.5% |
8 |
| n = 6 cv |
|
16.7% |
16.7% |
16.7% |
16.7% |
|
25.9% |
30.9% |
|
16.7% |
20.6% |
7 |
| n = 7 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.8% |
26.7% |
|
|
23.8% |
2 |
| n = 8 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0% |
23.1% |
|
|
19.6% |
2 |
| n = 9 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1% |
19.9% |
|
|
15.5% |
2 |
| n = 10 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9% |
|
|
16.9% |
1 |
| n = 11 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0% |
|
|
14.0% |
1 |
| n = 12 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0% |
|
|
11.0% |
1 |
| n = 13 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7% |
|
|
7.7% |
1 |
| n = 14 cv |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Numbers in this row are the actual coefficients of variation calculated.
Values in subsequent rows are the percentage reduction relative to this
number. |