Anthropology
263
Human Applications of Foraging Theory (4 units)
Spring Quarter,
2009; CRN # 93509
224 Young Hall; Wednesday; 10:00AM to 1:00 PM
Syllabus
In this seminar we will examine foraging
models -- a subfield of human behavioral ecology -- and their use in anthropological
analyses. We will cover basic theory, concepts and models, especially
those used in the analysis of hunter-gatherer economy and society. We
will examine both ethnographic and archaeological applications.
We begin with a historical and conceptual overview. We then discuss the
scientific and methodological bases for the study of complex adaptive
phenomena using behavioral ecology theory and simple models.
The heart
of the seminar will be a series of topically specific applications, each
of which is built around a particular model and associated empirical studies.
Among these applications are:
• encounter-contingent resource selection (diet
breadth model);
• use of patches and habitats (marginal value theorem);
• habitat and population distribution (ideal free distribution);
• home bases and field processing (central place foraging model;
Zeanah model);
• stochastic elements of foraging (z-score model and adaptations);
• resource sharing and distribution (transfer models);
• conservation behavior of foragers (long-term population ecology); and,
• implications of future discounting (for domestication, conservation).
Each of the first six of these topics will include a laboratory exercise,
using spreadsheets to create working applications of the models covered
in that week of the seminar.
We conclude with an analysis of hunter-gatherer conservation behavior,
from the perspective of behavioral ecology. If time permits, we will
have a discussion of the similarities and differences between behavioral
ecology and other forms of evolutionary study used in anthropology and
archaeology, including Darwinian and processual archaeology.
Our objectives will be analytical and methodological. What can be learned
from this research approach? How does an ethnographer or archaeologist
go about it? How does it compare with historical and contemporary alternatives
for the analysis of ethnographic or archaeological evidence on human
behavior?
Related Classes back
to top
This course is focused primarily on resource production and distribution.
It is designed to complement two other graduate seminars on anthropological
applications of behavioral ecology theory: Monique Borgerhoff Mulder's
ANT 262 (Evolution and Human Behavior), which covers, among
other topics, mating, parenting, life history and group structure, and
Richard McElreath's class, ANT 261 (Modeling the Evolution of Social
Behavior), which concentrates on game theory applications to topics
such as conflict, altruism, reciprocity, signaling and group selection.
Although ANT 263 draws on hunter-gatherer examples, Robert Bettinger's
class, ANT 178 (Hunter-Gatherers), provides a more comprehensive
ethnographic examination of this form of human economy.
Reading Materials back
to top
There is one required text:
Smith EA, Winterhalder B (1992)
Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior. New York, Aldine
de Gruyter.
Each week there will be a set of required and recommended articles.
I will make copies available to you a few weeks prior to their assignment.
Assignment Scheduleback
to top
Readings should be completed by the beginning of the class that follows
the date of the assignment.
Course Organization and Expectations back
to top
We will meet once a week, Wednesday, from 10:00AM to 1:00 PM. Every member
of the class is responsible for bringing a set of 3-5 discussion questions
and for a one-page précis of each of the assigned readings. A
description and outline of a precis is available here.
Each week will have an assigned discussion leader, a role that will
rotate among class members.
Beginning in week three, the first half of the class will be devoted to presentations and
discussion of the previous week’s laboratory exercise. Be prepared
to hand in a three-to-five page laboratory report (description
here), with supplemental tables
and graphs. In the second half of the class, we will take up the new topic
assigned for that week. Depending on class size, the laboratory exercises
will be done and reported individually, or in teams of two or three.
You will also be asked to prepare a short, 6-8 page (double spaced) research proposal,
adapting one of the models covered to a research setting that is of
particular interest to you. An outline for this proposal is available
here. This proposal will be
due the date of the last class (3 June).
In summary, your obligations for written work encompass:
1) A précis for each assigned
article;
2) Discussion questions for each class;
3) A 3-5 page lab report on each of the modeling exercises; and,
4) A short research proposal.
Office Hours back to
top
I will have office hours Tuesday and Thursday 1:30 to 3:00 PM, in 218 Young Hall. Times besides these
can be arranged individually. Should problems or questions arise you
also can reach me by phone (754-4770) or by e-mail (bwinterhalder@ucdavis.edu).
Grades back to top
Grades will be based on an assessment of both written (70%) and oral
(30%) assignments. Each of the seven lab reports and the research proposal
will count 10% toward the written total. The oral grade will include
class participation, assessed as willingness to take an informed role
in both critical and creative discussions (20%), and your preparation
as a discussion leader, when assigned that role (10%).
General back to top
This is
your seminar. Ideas
that might improve it for you individually or for the group, at the level
of organization, content and approach, are welcomed.
Full citations for the publications cited in the Schedule and Supplemental Bibliography can be found here.
Date |
Required and Recommended
Readings |
Topics & Activities |
Week 1
(1 April) |
Required:
(Bird & O'Connell 2006)
(Winterhalder 2002)
(Maynard Smith 1978)
(Winterhalder & Smith 1992: 3-23)
(Smith and Winterhalder 1992: 25-60)
Recommended:
(Elster 1983: 9-88)
(Elster 1986: 1-33)
(Foley 1985)
(Starfield and Bleloch 1986: 1-15)
(Towner and Luttbeg 2007)
|
Planning and Introduction(s) |
Week 2
(8 April) |
Required:
(MacArthur and Pianka 1966)
(Schoener 1974)
(Smith and Winterhalder 1992: 167-201) [Kaplan and Hill] Recommended:
(Broughton 2000)
(Broughton 2002a)
(de Boer, Blijdenstein & Longamane 2002) (Grayson et al. 2001)
((Madsen & Schmitt 1998)
|
Behavioral Ecology, Models and Basic Tools
Discussion of Readings
Leader:_______________ |
Week 3
(15 April) |
Required:
(Wiens 1976)
(Charnov 1976)
(Charnov et al. 1976)
(Smith and Winterhalder 1992: 237-266) [Cashdan]
Recommended:
(Lupo 2001)
(Sih 1980)
(Sosis 2002)
(Bettinger et al. 2006) |
Resource Selection (the encounter-contingent model)
Continue discussion of introductory readings, and those on encounter-contingent diet selection.
Leader:___________________
|
Week 4
(22 April) |
Required:
(Fretwell and Lucas Jr 1970)
(Kennett et al. 2006)
(Sutherland 1996: Ch. 1)
(Whitehead and Hope 1991)
Recommended:
(Abrahams & Healy 1990)
(Kennett et al. 2009)
(Kraft & Baum 2001)
(Madden et al. 2002)
(Tregenza 1994) |
Use of Patches (the marginal value theorem)
Review of EXERCISE #1 & Discussion of Readings on patches
Leader:_______________ |
Week 5
(29 April) |
Required:
(Orians and Pearson 1979)
(Metcalfe and Barlow 1992)
(Bettinger et al. 1997)
(Zeanah 2002)
(Morgan 2008)
Recommended:
(Bird and Bliege Bird1997) (Barlow et al. 1993)
(Barlow and Metcalfe 1996)
(Beck et al. 2002)
(Cannon 2003)
(Rogers and Broughton 1999) |
Habitat Selection (the ideal free distribution)
Review of EXERCISE #2 & Discussion of Readings on the ideal free distribution
Leader:_______________ |
Week 6
(6 May) |
Required:
(Stephens and Charnov 1982)
(Winterhalder et al. 1999)
(Winterhalder 2008)
(Heinrich and McElreath 2002)
Recommended:
(Mace 1993)
(Goland 1993)
(Elston & Zeanah 2002) |
Home Bases (central place foraging and field processing)
Review of EXERCISE #3 & Discussion of Readings on central place foraging
Leader:_______________ |
Week 7
(13 May) |
Required:
(Smith and Winterhalder 1992: 269-300) [Hawkes]
(Hawkes 1993)
(Winterhalder 1996)
(Gurven and Hill 2009)
Recommended:
(Hildebrandt & McGuire 2002, 2003)
(Broughton & Bayhem 2003)
(Hames and McCabe 2007)
(Hawkes & Bliege Bird 2002)
(Jones 2008)
(Tucker 2002)
(Smith and Bliege Bird 2001)
(Marlowe 1999)
(Gurven 2004)
(Wood 2006) |
Stochasticity (Risk-sensitive foraging)
Review of EXERCISE #4 & Discussion of Readings on risk-sensitive models
Leader:_______________ |
Week 8
(20 May) |
Required:
(Hames 1987)
(Rogers 1991)
(Alvard 1998)
(Winterhalder & Lu) Recommended:
(Broughton 2002b)
(FitzGibbon 1998)
(Alvard 1994)
(Tucker 2007) |
Intra-Group Distribution (resource transfer models)
Review of EXERCISE #5 Discussion of Readings on food transfers and costly signaling.
Leader:_______________ |
Week 9
(27 May) |
Required:
(Tucker 2006)
(Barlow 2006)
(Alvard and Kuznar 2001)
(Winterhalder & Lu 1997)
Recommended:
(Fehr 2002)
(Stephens 2001) |
Resource Depletion – Short Term (population ecology
models)
Review of EXERCISE #6 & Discussion of Readings on population ecology and conservation.
Leader:_______________ |
Week 10
(3 June) |
|
Discounting models and their implications
Review of EXERCISE #7 & Discussion of Readings on discounting
Leader:_______________ |
HBE compared to other approaches in
Anthropology & Archaeology:
Article-length Reviews of Human Behavioral
Ecology:
Key OFT/HBE Volumes in Anthropology
& Biology:
-
(Alvard 2004)
-
(Caro 1998)
-
(Cronk et al. 2000)
-
(Danchin et al. 2008)
- (Giraldeau and Caraco 2000)
-
(Kamil et al. 1987)
-
(Kamil and Sargent 1981)
-
(Krebs and Davies 1978)
-
(Krebs and Davies 1984)
-
(Krebs and Davies 1991)
-
(Krebs and Davies 1997)
-
(Smith and Winterhalder 1992)
-
(Stephens and Krebs 1986)
-
(Winterhalder and Smith 1981)
Monograph-length HBE Studies in Anthropology
and Archaeology: